8 research outputs found

    'Give Me Structure':Synthesis and Evaluation of a (Network) Threat Analysis Process Supporting Tier 1 Investigations in a Security Operation Center

    Get PDF
    Current threat analysis processes followed by tier-1 (T1) analysts in a Security Operation Center (SOC) rely mainly on tacit knowledge, and can differ greatly across analysts. The lack of structure and clear objectives to T1 analyses makes operative inefficiencies hard to spot, SOC performance hard to measure (and therefore improve), results in overall lower security for the monitored environment(s), and contributes to analyst burnout. In this work we collaborate with a commercial SOC to devise a 4-stage (network) process to support the collection and analysis of relevant information for threat analysis. We conduct an experiment with ten T1 analysts employed in the SOC and show that analysts following the proposed process are 2.5 times more likely to produce an accurate assessment than analysts who do not. We evaluate qualitatively the effects of the process on analysts decisions, and discuss implications for practice and research

    Electroweak measurements in electron–positron collisions at w-boson-pair energies at lep

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 121524.pdf (preprint version ) (Open Access

    Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data

    Get PDF
    The four LEP collaborations, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL, have searched for pair-produced charged Higgs bosons in the framework of Two Higgs Doublet Models (2HDMs). The data of the four experiments are statistically combined. The results are interpreted within the 2HDM for Type I and Type II benchmark scenarios. No statistically significant excess has been observed when compared to the Standard Model background prediction, and the combined LEP data exclude large regions of the model parameter space. Charged Higgs bosons with mass below 80 GeV/c^2 (Type II scenario) or 72.5 GeV/c^2 (Type I scenario, for pseudo-scalar masses above 12 GeV/c^2) are excluded at the 95% confidence level
    corecore